Any form of life or any form of heavy atom, stone, star, or galaxy would do nothing specifically human or anthropic is involved. While singling out the currently-observable kind of carbon-based life, none of the finely tuned phenomena require human life or some kind of carbon chauvinism. The term anthropic in "anthropic principle" has been argued to be a misnomer. That is, it must be possible to observe some universe, and hence, the laws and constants of any such universe must accommodate that possibility. The anthropic principle states that this is a necessity, because if life were impossible, no living entity would be there to observe it, and thus it would not be known.
#Anthropic theory series
The principle was formulated as a response to a series of observations that the laws of nature and parameters of the universe have values that are consistent with conditions for life as it is known rather than values that would not be consistent with life on Earth. Barrow and Frank Tipler, which views the universe's structure as expressible by bits of information in such a way that information processing is inevitable and eternal. Stronger yet is the final anthropic principle ( FAP), proposed by John D. A form of the latter known as the participatory anthropic principle, articulated by John Archibald Wheeler, suggests on the basis of quantum mechanics that the universe, as a condition of its existence, must be observed, thus implying one or more observers. Carter distinguished the WAP from the strong anthropic principle ( SAP), which considers the universe in some sense compelled to eventually have conscious and sapient life emerge within it. However, a single vast universe is sufficient for most forms of the WAP that do not specifically deal with fine tuning. Most such arguments draw upon some notion of the multiverse for there to be a statistical population of universes from which to select. The weak anthropic principle ( WAP), as defined by Brandon Carter, states that the universe's ostensible fine tuning is the result of selection bias (specifically survivorship bias).
Philosopher Nick Bostrom counts them at thirty, but the underlying principles can be divided into "weak" and "strong" forms, depending on the types of cosmological claims they entail. There are many different formulations of the anthropic principle. Anthropic reasoning is often used to deal with the idea that the universe seems to be finely tuned for the existence of life. Proponents of the anthropic principle argue that it explains why this universe has the age and the fundamental physical constants necessary to accommodate conscious life, since if either had been different, no one would have been around to make observations.
The anthropic principle, also known as the "observation selection effect", is the hypothesis, first proposed in 1957 by Robert Dicke, that the range of possible observations that could be made about the universe is limited by the fact that observations could happen only in a universe capable of developing intelligent life. For the book by Nick Bostrom, see Anthropic Bias (book).
0 kommentar(er)
